Notes
Ethics & Professionalism
Medical Ethics — Boards-Style Scenarios
Mark complete
Ethics & Professionalism
Medical Ethics — Boards-Style Scenarios
Capacity, consent, confidentiality, surrogates, end-of-life, professionalism.
Select any text to highlight it or make a flashcard.
◆
Four principles & priority
•
Autonomy (gold standard; overrides everything else for competent adult)
•
Beneficence (best interest)
•
Nonmaleficence (do no harm)
•
Justice (fair distribution)
•
On boards: AUTONOMY always wins for competent adult
◆
Decision-making capacity
•
4 components: Understanding + Appreciation + Reasoning + Communication of choice
•
ANY physician can assess (don't need psychiatry)
•
Decision-SPECIFIC and can fluctuate
•
Dementia, mental illness, intoxication do NOT automatically mean incapacity
•
Schizophrenia patient who can explain dx, tx, risks, reasoning → has capacity even if odd
•
Intoxication acutely → wait for sobriety (unless life-threatening, then emergency consent)
◆
Informed consent — required elements
•
Diagnosis
•
Risks + benefits
•
Alternatives
•
RISK of refusing (could they die?)
•
Person performing procedure should obtain consent
•
Telephone consent OK with witness
•
Pregnant women can refuse anything (fetus not legally a person)
◆
Exceptions to informed consent
•
Emergency: life-threatening + cannot consent + no surrogate → treat
•
Therapeutic privilege: rarely correct — only if disclosure causes severe psychological harm
•
Waiver: patient voluntarily declines info
•
Implied: routine low-risk procedures (blood draw)
◆
Minors
•
Generally cannot consent; emergencies = always treat
•
FULL emancipation: marriage, military, financially independent, minor parent
•
PARTIAL (specific conditions): contraception, prenatal care, STI testing, substance abuse, mental health (varies by state)
•
Parents can NOT refuse life-saving treatment for child based on religion (Jehovah's Witnesses) → court order if time permits; transfuse if not
•
Judicial bypass for parental-consent abortion laws
◆
Confidentiality — exceptions (mandatory disclosure)
•
Suspected child abuse OR elder abuse (suspicion alone, no proof needed)
•
Gunshot wounds
•
Reportable infections: HIV/AIDS, syphilis, TB, gonorrhea, measles, mumps
•
Tarasoff: identifiable target + imminent harm → warn AND protect (police + victim)
•
Impaired drivers (some states)
•
SPOUSAL abuse: cannot report without consent of competent adult victim
◆
Confidentiality — protected
•
Minors STI/contraception/prenatal: do NOT disclose to parents
•
Spouse cannot demand records or HIV results
•
Police without warrant: do NOT disclose
•
HIPAA: no chart access without treatment/payment/operations purpose
◆
Surrogate decision-making hierarchy
•
1. Living will (patient's documented wishes)
•
2. Healthcare proxy (DPOA): overrides default family
•
3. Spouse → Adult children → Parents → Siblings → Friends
•
Substituted judgment: 'what would the patient want?'
•
Best interest standard: only for patients who NEVER had capacity
•
Disagreement: encourage consensus → ethics committee (last resort)
◆
End-of-life
•
Withholding = withdrawing (ethically equivalent)
•
Double effect: ethical to give high-dose opioids if intent is pain relief (even if hastens death)
•
DNR/DNAR: applies only to CPR; doesn't preclude ICU, surgery, dialysis
•
DNR + surgery: discuss preoperatively
•
Brain death = legal death; any physician can declare; EEG NOT required
•
Organ donation: separate physician (not transplant team) declares brain death
•
Physician-assisted death: legal in Oregon, WA, etc. (capacity, repeated requests, self-administered)
•
Euthanasia (physician administers): ILLEGAL everywhere in US
◆
Professionalism
•
Sexual contact with current patients: ALWAYS prohibited
•
Psychiatrists: never with current OR former patients
•
Gifts: small from patients OK; industry <$100 educational only
•
Impaired colleague: mandatory report (resident → program director; attending → dept chair or state board)
•
Good Samaritan: no obligation to start; once start, must transfer to EMS
•
Errors: disclose to patient; apology + transparency
•
'I'm sorry' laws in many states protect expressions of sympathy
•
Wrong-site surgery, retained foreign body = NEVER events → full disclosure + RCA
◆
Research ethics
•
IRB approval REQUIRED before enrolling subjects
•
Patient can withdraw at any time without penalty
•
Clinical equipoise: genuine uncertainty required for randomization
•
Placebo arm unethical if effective standard exists (Declaration of Helsinki)
•
Financial COI: mandatory disclosure
•
Prisoners: identical rights; no coercion with promises of release
•
Organ donation request: separate from treating team
◆
Pregnant patients
•
Right to refuse C-section even with fetal distress (fetus not a legal person)
•
Spousal consent NEVER required
•
Brain dead + pregnant: somatic support to allow fetal maturation if family requests
◆
Quality improvement
•
Value = Quality / Cost
•
Lean methodology: optimize workflow, eliminate waste
•
PDSA cycle: Plan-Do-Study-Act
•
Measures: structural, process, outcome, balancing
•
SMART goals: Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound
•
Root-cause analysis (RCA): RETROSPECTIVE after sentinel event
•
FMEA: PROSPECTIVE, identifies how processes could fail
•
Strong actions: forcing functions; weak: training, double-checks
•
Active errors: sharp end (operator); latent: blunt end (system flaws)
High-yield pearls
◆
AUTONOMY > Beneficence on boards — competent adult can refuse anything
◆
Capacity ≠ Competence (clinical vs legal)
◆
Tarasoff: duty to warn AND protect
◆
Brain death = legal death; no EEG required
◆
Spousal abuse: cannot report without consent (vs child/elder = mandatory)
◆
PROXY > family hierarchy
◆
Pregnant women can refuse C-section regardless of fetal outcome
Done reading?
Track your progress by marking this complete.
Mark complete
Next in Ethics & Professionalism